Math  /  Data & Statistics

QuestionSubmit quiz
A group of students estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that these times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds. Does it appear that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute? 7693477648357270775974801029571\begin{array}{lllllllllllllll} 76 & 93 & 47 & 76 & 48 & 35 & 72 & 70 & 77 & 59 & 74 & 80 & 102 & 95 & 71 \end{array}
Assuming all conditions for conducting a hypothesis test are met, what are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. H0:μ=60\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mu=60 seconds B. H0:μ=60H_{0}: \mu=60 seconds H1:μ>60H_{1}: \mu>60 seconds H1:μ60H_{1}: \mu \neq 60 seconds C. H0:μ=60\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mu=60 seconds D. H0:μ60H_{0}: \mu \neq 60 seconds H1:μ<60\mathrm{H}_{1}: \mu<60 seconds H1:μ=60H_{1}: \mu=60 seconds
Determine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Determine the P -value. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Studdy Solution
State the conclusion:
Since the P-value (0.0020.002) is less than the significance level (0.010.01), we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean time estimated by students is not equal to 60 seconds. It appears that students are not reasonably good at estimating one minute.

View Full Solution - Free
Was this helpful?

Studdy solves anything!

banner

Start learning now

Download Studdy AI Tutor now. Learn with ease and get all help you need to be successful at school.

ParentsInfluencer programContactPolicyTerms
TwitterInstagramFacebookTikTokDiscord