Question3. Show that .
Note: A complete proof uses mathematical induction. Math majors may want to try this. Everyone else, just show that it holds for using the definition of the Laplace transform.
Studdy Solution
STEP 1
What is this asking? Show that the Laplace Transform of is equal to , specifically for the case where . Watch out! Don't forget to carefully apply integration by parts if needed!
STEP 2
1. Define the Laplace Transform
2. Compute for
STEP 3
Alright, let's **kick things off** by reminding ourselves what the Laplace Transform actually *is*!
The Laplace Transform of a function , written as , is defined as:
This formula takes our function and transforms it into a new function of .
It's like giving our function a magical makeover!
STEP 4
Now, we want to find the Laplace Transform of when , which means we're looking at .
Let's **plug this into** our Laplace Transform formula:
STEP 5
Time for some **integration by parts**!
Remember, the formula for integration by parts is:
Let's choose and .
Then, and .
STEP 6
**Substituting** these values into the integration by parts formula, we get:
STEP 7
Let's **evaluate the first term**: The limit is zero because the exponential term decays to zero much faster than grows as approaches infinity.
STEP 8
Now, let's **tackle the second term**:
STEP 9
So, putting it all together, we have: And since , we can write this as: This **matches** the formula for !
STEP 10
We have shown that for , the Laplace Transform of is indeed , which in this case is .
Was this helpful?