QuestionBack in 1993, a study found 52 in a sample of 503 European women were mathematicians. A similar study,
conducted in 2005, found 88 in a sample of 495 European women were mathematicians.
Let , represent the proportion of European woman mathematicians in 1993 and in 2005 respectively. At
significance level 0.002, is this good evidence showing that the proportion of women mathematicians in
Europe has changed in 12 years since 1993?
A) State the Null and the Alternate Hypotheses:
()
()
B) Is this a (left-tail, right-tail, one-tail, two-tail) test?
two-tail
C) Using 4 decimal places for and , find the value of .
____
Note: must be in 4 decimal places.
D) Find the value of .
Round your answer to 4 decimal places.
E) Find , the standard error of 's:
____
Round your answer to 4 decimal places.
F) Calculate the z-score of your sampling difference in proportion.
____
Enter your answer in 2 decimal places.
G) Using z-score from part (F), what is the p-value of this test?
p-value ____
Studdy Solution
STEP 1
What is this asking?
We're comparing the proportion of female mathematicians in Europe between 1993 and 2005 to see if there's been a significant change!
Watch out!
Don't mix up and - is for 1993, and is for 2005.
Keep your years straight!
STEP 2
1. Identify hypotheses and test type
2. Calculate sample proportions
3. Find the pooled proportion
4. Calculate the standard error
5. Compute the z-score
6. Determine the p-value
STEP 3
Alright, let's kick this off by looking at our hypotheses!
The question has already given us the correct null and alternate hypotheses:
H_1: p_1 \neq p_2 \text{ (dp ≠ 0)}
This is saying that our null hypothesis assumes no change in the proportion of women mathematicians, while our alternate hypothesis suggests there is a change (either increase or decrease).
STEP 4
Now, what kind of test are we dealing with?
The question tells us it's a **two-tail test**.
This makes sense because we're looking for any change, not just an increase or decrease.
STEP 5
Let's crunch some numbers!
We need to find and .
Remember, is for 1993 and is for 2005.
For 1993:
For 2005:
STEP 6
Now we can find dp (the difference in proportions):
Rounding to 4 decimal places as requested:
STEP 7
The pooled proportion is already given to us in the problem:
This value represents the overall proportion if we combine both samples.
It's a weighted average of and .
STEP 8
Now, let's calculate the standard error of dp.
We'll use this formula:
Where and
STEP 9
Let's plug in our values:
STEP 10
Time to crunch these numbers:
Rounding to 4 decimal places:
STEP 11
Now we're ready to calculate our z-score!
Here's the formula:
We use 0 in the numerator because our null hypothesis assumes no difference.
STEP 12
Let's plug in our values:
Rounding to 2 decimal places as requested:
STEP 13
To find the p-value, we need to use a z-table or a calculator.
Since this is a two-tailed test, we'll find the area under both tails of the normal distribution.
STEP 14
Using a z-table or calculator, we find that the area to the right of z = 3.38 is approximately 0.000362.
STEP 15
Since this is a two-tailed test, we double this value:
p-value = 2 * 0.000362 = 0.000724
Rounding to 4 decimal places: p-value = 0.0007
STEP 16
A) The null hypothesis is (dp = 0), and the alternative hypothesis is (dp ≠ 0).
B) This is a two-tail test.
C) The value of dp is 0.0744.
D) The value of is 0.1403.
E) The standard error of dp (σdp) is 0.0220.
F) The z-score of the sampling difference in proportion is 3.38.
G) The p-value of this test is 0.0007.
Was this helpful?